A Changing Industry - PEST

The politics of the publishing industry are shifting, from the powerful to the everyman. While the rich aristocracy, who owned the publishing companies, formally dictated what was considered ‘good writing’ the ability to self-publish online is providing an open platform for the public. Although this opportunity is not without its problems, the legalities of ownership rights being one, this semi–amateur nature of digital publishing changes the traditional narrative of the industry.

Economically speaking, this is a positive change. For aspiring authors, or those so far relatively unknown, online publishing may be more profitable as they eliminate the middleman. Online publishing can also increase the distribution, which would increase circulation, whether it be books or magazines, this could only be beneficial to profits. The nature of digital publishing and the popularity of the e-reader has even widened the industry, with an opportunity for profit for outside companies. As our increasingly green society steps away from the paper trail of traditional publishing, and towards the economically friendly e-reader, hardware creators such as Apple and Amazon stand to gain in the digitization. It is not just the author and publisher who will make money.

With the advancements of technology in the industry, publishing is becoming increasingly social. Online publishing is impacting on the authorship of books by making it a social rather than solitary occupation; blogs that post chapter-by-chapter can allow the feedback from readers’ commentary to effect the direction of the narrative. Social media allows you to be an engaging community rather than just an isolated reader. The popularity and convenience of e-readers is no surprise considering the shift in attitude towards technology in recent generations, compared with our older relatives.

The technological advancements have without a doubt massively affected the publishing industry as it tries to adapt, and with their potential for constant improvement they seem able to change it further in the future. This effect can threaten traditional publishers and force them to compete in order to survive; such as Barnes and Noble and the ‘Nook’ (Erin Carreiro: Electronic Books: How Digital Devices and Supplementary New Technologies are Changing the Face of the Publishing Industry). For the consumer, the technology can be both positive and negative. While the technology does allow you to connect with the text and use social media to input your opinions, having a digital version with constantly changing commentary on it means you never get a complete, single version of the text. Either way, technology is by no means destroying the publishing industry, instead it is providing extra platforms through which we can interact and consume.